mha fp5020 client meeting and project approval

Hospital Acquired Infections (HAI) at Parkland Hospital in Texas.

Client Meeting and Project Approval Guide Purpose of the Meeting The purpose of this meeting is to: • Explain your role as a master’s degree learner offering a project as a part of your degree completion requirement at Capella University. Note: Remember that you are an ambassador for Capella University. Your professional appearance, behavior, and preparation should reflect positively on the organization. • Explain your proposed data review project and the course requirements to the client. • Redefine your performance indicators and outcome measures, as needed. • Negotiate potential changes to the project that will enhance its value to an organization, while meeting the requirements of the capstone course. • Obtain client approval for your data review project. Scheduling the Meeting After identifying your first choice for a point of contact in the organization, you must contact that person and schedule a meeting. The meeting can take place in person, via web conference, or over the phone. Be prepared to contact a second person if you are unable to meet your first choice. Note: Face-to-face interaction is essential for developing a strong professional network. An inperson meeting is strongly encouraged. However, if you are unable to meet with the client in person, consider hosting an online meeting to increase the level of engagement in the call. Initiating Client Contact You are encouraged to use the following sample talking points for initiating contact with the health care organization: My name is [insert your name]. I am a learner in the master’s program on health care administration at Capella University. I am currently enrolled in the capstone course, in which learners help a health care organization examine a real-world issue or problem. The topic must be one in which I can examine the existing information or data, either from a practicing health care professional or perhaps the data that has already been collected. Potential examples include patient satisfaction surveys, compliance with a new regulation, patient safety initiatives, or evaluating process deviations for a new service line offering or system, such as admitting home care patients onto the service. I am offering to volunteer my services to draft a project proposal, complete a data review, and provide recommendations on how to address the issue. These recommendations will include insights from current peer-reviewed health care journals. 2 Would you be willing to work with me on a project that examines data on [insert topic here; for example, compliance with the new hospice reimbursement system]? This would involve a meeting with me for 15–20 minutes to provide feedback on how I would examine and organize the data. Then I would review the data, review the relevant, authoritative literature, and provide a project report, with my findings, at the end of the course. Would this be helpful, and if so, may I contact you via e-mail to send a copy of the draft proposal after my instructor has approved it? Thanks so much for your time, [Your name] Client Background and Communication Preferences Consider the following questions before you meet with the client: • Have you thoroughly researched the organization’s website and the professional background of the client? Have you obtained any other information necessary to provide perspective on the organization’s potential needs? • Is the client’s organization currently undergoing any major change that might have an impact on your proposed project? • Does your client prefer to meet with you over the phone, via web conference or chat room, in person, or via another modality? • What time or setting is ideal for the client? Presenting Your Project Proposal At the meeting, present the project proposal you developed in Assessment 2, and explain your role as a master’s degree learner offering a data review project as a part of your degree completion requirement at Capella University. • Explain your proposed project and the course requirements. Explain that you are seeking the client’s approval to review the existing data. Answer any questions. • Describe briefly what type of data you will be examining, what performance indicators you will be examining, and how you are proposing to measure each indicator. In addition, explain how you will visually display your summarized data (for example, as a pie chart, graph, spreadsheet, and process map). • Communicate to your client any statistical or other software that may be needed for the data analysis. • Explain how you will measure the outcomes for each of the four areas of the balanced scorecard. Refining Your Project Proposal After presenting your proposal, request feedback from the client on the scope and feasibility of your project. In addition, attempt to identify examples of evidence-based support for selected key performance indicators, determine whether you can gain access to additional related data sets, and verify the accessibility of data sets that could be made available for you to review. 3 The meeting is an opportunity to work with your client to redefine the performance indicators and outcome measures that you propose to examine. It is also an opportunity to make changes that will be of mutual benefit and enhance the outcome of the project. Before approving your data review project, the client may have a few suggestions to enhance your data analysis, such as adding a performance indicator, using a specific benchmark, or using an existing assessment tool. The client may also want to add something to your project for inclusion in the final report or may want you to spend more time on the project than is allotted. In such instances, you must negotiate a solution that meets both the course requirements and your client’s needs. It is your job to verify, discover, or redefine your performance indicators and outcome measures so you can proceed to your data review. Consequently, you may wish to initiate a preliminary discussion with your client on the following points: • Units of service. • Types of units applicable to your project. • Selection of units. • Output performance measures: o Scope definition. o Service completion. o Client outcomes. • Quality dimensions. • Four types of outcome measures and rationale for your selected measures. • Process for selecting outcome measures, such as stakeholder input and assessment. • Use of standardized measures. • Use of performance measurement information. During the meeting, you may discover the following: • You have chosen the wrong indicators for your problem statement. • The indicators are not included in the organization’s data sets. • The client thinks that different indicators might be more helpful. • There is limited data on a performance indicator. • There are incomplete entries or lack of consistent coding of data. • There are mismatched data sets from which you have to generate a meaningful summary. Obtaining Project Approval Agree to submit a revised project proposal, which integrates the client’s feedback and any negotiated changes before you end the meeting. Try to obtain a commitment from the client to sign and return the approved proposal so that you may proceed with the data review. 4 Submit the revised proposal to the client for final approval. Ensure that your client signs the revised copy of your proposal.

Preparation

To prepare for this assessment, read the following document, linked in the Resources of this unit.

  • Client Meeting and Project Approval Guide.

The information provided in this document will help you in preparing for the meeting, presenting your data review project proposal, and obtaining approval for your project from the client. In addition, it provides guidance, recommendations, and examples that are crucial to successfully complete this assessment. You are encouraged to download this document and keep it on hand as a ready reference.

Key Preparatory Tasks for a Successful Meeting

Thorough preparation will ensure that your meeting is productive. Take the following steps to prepare for the meeting:

  • Conduct background research on your prospective client organization. Identify a first and second choice for connecting with a practicing health care professional in that organization.
  • Research best practices for professional communication and feedback to prepare for the interview.
  • Reflect upon your experience in human services and health care administration relevant to your proposed project. Based on the NCHL competencies, is your proposed project realistic?
  • Prepare a list of questions that you would like to ask the practicing health care professional. Refer to the Client Meeting and Project Approval Guide, linked in the Resources of this unit.

Note: You should arrive at the meeting with proposed performance indicators related to the health care issue you have identified. However, it is possible that you have chosen the wrong indicators, that the indicators are not included in the organization’s data sets, or that the client thinks different indicators might be more helpful. It is your job to verify, discover, or redefine your performance indicators so that you can proceed with your data review.

Requirements

You will need to take the following steps to complete this assessment. Details and supporting information for completing each step are contained in the Client Meeting and Project Approval Guide linked in the Resources of this unit.

Step 1: Schedule a meeting with the prospective client.

Step 2: Meet with the client and present your project proposal.

Step 3: Work with the client to refine your project proposal as necessary, including any negotiated changes.

Step 4: Submit the revised proposal to the client for their approval and signature.

Step 5: Submit the signed copy of your approved proposal as the deliverable for this assessment. Include an addendum summarizing the feedback offered by your client during the meeting, and provide any substantive, relevant details needed for clarification.

Note: You must submit the revised copy of your approved project proposal for this assessment. The client’s signature, title, and contact information are required.

Client Meeting

Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that you address each point, at a minimum, during the client meeting and project approval process. You may also want to read the Client Meeting and Project Approval Scoring Guide to better understand how each criterion will be assessed.

  • Identify the appropriate health care professional in an organization from whom to seek approval for a proposed project.
    • Consider the people with the requisite decision-making authority who are best able to provide guidance and recommendations.
  • Present a project proposal to a client.
    • Provide evidence-based support for your assertions and conclusions.
    • Be clear about the project scope, execution, and focus.
    • Be clear about the value of your proposed project and how you will measure the outcomes for each of the four areas of the balanced scorecard.
    • Be prepared to answer questions that the client asks.
  • Negotiate changes to project scope, execution, or focus, based on feedback solicited from the client.
    • Use this meeting as an opportunity to refine your proposed project.
    • Solicit feedback actively on key aspects of the project.
    • Verify, discover, or redefine your performance indicators and outcome measures.
    • Ensure that negotiated changes are feasible and do not present obstacles to successful course completion.
  • Obtain approval for a proposed project.
    • Be sure that your revised proposal is a collaborative effort between you and the client that meets organizational requirements, such as confidentiality.
    • Consider your role and responsibilities for establishing a strong working relationship with the client in executing the project.
    • Client Meeting and Project Approval Guide Purpose of the Meeting The purpose of this meeting is to: • Explain your role as a master’s degree learner offering a project as a part of your degree completion requirement at Capella University. Note: Remember that you are an ambassador for Capella University. Your professional appearance, behavior, and preparation should reflect positively on the organization. • Explain your proposed data review project and the course requirements to the client. • Redefine your performance indicators and outcome measures, as needed. • Negotiate potential changes to the project that will enhance its value to an organization, while meeting the requirements of the capstone course. • Obtain client approval for your data review project. Scheduling the Meeting After identifying your first choice for a point of contact in the organization, you must contact that person and schedule a meeting. The meeting can take place in person, via web conference, or over the phone. Be prepared to contact a second person if you are unable to meet your first choice. Note: Face-to-face interaction is essential for developing a strong professional network. An inperson meeting is strongly encouraged. However, if you are unable to meet with the client in person, consider hosting an online meeting to increase the level of engagement in the call. Initiating Client Contact You are encouraged to use the following sample talking points for initiating contact with the health care organization: My name is [insert your name]. I am a learner in the master’s program on health care administration at Capella University. I am currently enrolled in the capstone course, in which learners help a health care organization examine a real-world issue or problem. The topic must be one in which I can examine the existing information or data, either from a practicing health care professional or perhaps the data that has already been collected. Potential examples include patient satisfaction surveys, compliance with a new regulation, patient safety initiatives, or evaluating process deviations for a new service line offering or system, such as admitting home care patients onto the service. I am offering to volunteer my services to draft a project proposal, complete a data review, and provide recommendations on how to address the issue. These recommendations will include insights from current peer-reviewed health care journals. 2 Would you be willing to work with me on a project that examines data on [insert topic here; for example, compliance with the new hospice reimbursement system]? This would involve a meeting with me for 15–20 minutes to provide feedback on how I would examine and organize the data. Then I would review the data, review the relevant, authoritative literature, and provide a project report, with my findings, at the end of the course. Would this be helpful, and if so, may I contact you via e-mail to send a copy of the draft proposal after my instructor has approved it? Thanks so much for your time, [Your name] Client Background and Communication Preferences Consider the following questions before you meet with the client: • Have you thoroughly researched the organization’s website and the professional background of the client? Have you obtained any other information necessary to provide perspective on the organization’s potential needs? • Is the client’s organization currently undergoing any major change that might have an impact on your proposed project? • Does your client prefer to meet with you over the phone, via web conference or chat room, in person, or via another modality? • What time or setting is ideal for the client? Presenting Your Project Proposal At the meeting, present the project proposal you developed in Assessment 2, and explain your role as a master’s degree learner offering a data review project as a part of your degree completion requirement at Capella University. • Explain your proposed project and the course requirements. Explain that you are seeking the client’s approval to review the existing data. Answer any questions. • Describe briefly what type of data you will be examining, what performance indicators you will be examining, and how you are proposing to measure each indicator. In addition, explain how you will visually display your summarized data (for example, as a pie chart, graph, spreadsheet, and process map). • Communicate to your client any statistical or other software that may be needed for the data analysis. • Explain how you will measure the outcomes for each of the four areas of the balanced scorecard. Refining Your Project Proposal After presenting your proposal, request feedback from the client on the scope and feasibility of your project. In addition, attempt to identify examples of evidence-based support for selected key performance indicators, determine whether you can gain access to additional related data sets, and verify the accessibility of data sets that could be made available for you to review. 3 The meeting is an opportunity to work with your client to redefine the performance indicators and outcome measures that you propose to examine. It is also an opportunity to make changes that will be of mutual benefit and enhance the outcome of the project. Before approving your data review project, the client may have a few suggestions to enhance your data analysis, such as adding a performance indicator, using a specific benchmark, or using an existing assessment tool. The client may also want to add something to your project for inclusion in the final report or may want you to spend more time on the project than is allotted. In such instances, you must negotiate a solution that meets both the course requirements and your client’s needs. It is your job to verify, discover, or redefine your performance indicators and outcome measures so you can proceed to your data review. Consequently, you may wish to initiate a preliminary discussion with your client on the following points: • Units of service. • Types of units applicable to your project. • Selection of units. • Output performance measures: o Scope definition. o Service completion. o Client outcomes. • Quality dimensions. • Four types of outcome measures and rationale for your selected measures. • Process for selecting outcome measures, such as stakeholder input and assessment. • Use of standardized measures. • Use of performance measurement information. During the meeting, you may discover the following: • You have chosen the wrong indicators for your problem statement. • The indicators are not included in the organization’s data sets. • The client thinks that different indicators might be more helpful. • There is limited data on a performance indicator. • There are incomplete entries or lack of consistent coding of data. • There are mismatched data sets from which you have to generate a meaningful summary. Obtaining Project Approval Agree to submit a revised project proposal, which integrates the client’s feedback and any negotiated changes before you end the meeting. Try to obtain a commitment from the client to sign and return the approved proposal so that you may proceed with the data review. 4 Submit the revised proposal to the client for final approval. Ensure that your client signs the revised copy of your proposal.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

three dimensions along which e business scenarios can be classified

Course Objectives

  • Demonstrate a knowledge of the fundamentals of e-Business
  • Discuss the role of e-Business in practical business applications

Prompt:

Explain the three dimensions along which e-Business scenarios can be classified. Use examples to illustrate.

Instructions:
Response should be approximately 2-3 pages (not counting the cover page and references page), supported with credible references and corresponding in-text citations, all in APA format.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

analyzing amp visualizing data week 7

Kirk (2016) tells us that data adjustments affects what data is displayed and presentation adjustments affects how the data is displayed. Each of the adjustments involve specific features. Data adjustments include: Framing, Navigating, Animating, Sequencing, and Contributing. Presentation adjustments include: Focusing, Annotating, and Orientating. Select one feature and expand on it.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

personal philosophy of nursing paper 2

The purpose of this paper is to define, describe and explain your thoughts, feelings and beliefs about the four concepts of the nursing metaparadigm and their interrelationship to one another as they guide your current nursing practice. There are no right or wrong thoughts, feelings or beliefs; these represent your own philosophical beliefs. If your current philosophy includes any particular nursing or other theory(ies), identify these. The final paper is to be typed according to APA format and no more than 5 pages in length. The paper should include a title page and reference list, however, these pages are not to be included in the final count.

Evaluation criteria are as follows:

Criteria for Personal Philosophy of Nursing Paper:

1.Introduction – identifies purpose of the paper. ( 5 points)

2.Brief description of the factors influencing the development of the personal nursing philosophy. (5 points)

3.Define, describe and explain your personal thoughts, feelings and beliefs about the concepts of the nursing metaparadigm: ( 25 points)

4.Person/client

5.Environment

6.Health

7.Nursing

8.Summarized interrelationship of the concept

9.Identification and brief description of the nursing theory ies) found to be the most compatible with the student’s personal nursing philosophy. (25 points)

10.Provided explanation, with documentation, that demonstrated compatibility of personal philosophy with the nursing theory (ies) identified in #4 according to: (25 points)

11.Person/client

12.Environment

13.Health

14.Nursing e. Summarized interrelationship of concepts

15.Summary and conclusion (5 points)

16.Organization, documentation, references followed APA format. (10 points)

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

evaluation essay 41

For this assignment, you will write your evaluation essay. You are required to submit only your final draft for this assignment (though we encourage all students to take advantage of the additional feedback a draft can provide). Use the grader’s feedback and the rubric to make revisions to your draft before submitting the final. Your second draft will be graded.

Now that you have completed Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, you are in a good position to consider what critics have written about the novel. You will need a total of two critiques (also known as critical analysis essays) for this assignment.

First, use the selection of links below to locate a critical analysis essay written about the 1818 version of Mary Shelley’s novel. You may focus most of your attention on this first critique. If the author of your critique is not specified, focus on the publication of the critique.

Choose from among these sources:

The questions in the study guides should have helped you evaluate this criticism in your head. Now it’s time to write it down!

Your evaluation may go more smoothly if you approach the guiding questions in this order:

Evaluate the critic/author:

Who wrote the criticism you read? What credentials does the author have? (If you are using a valid source, you should be able to find these easily)

Find the thesis of the article:

What is the thesis of the critical article you’ve chosen? What point does the author want to make about Frankenstein?

Evaluate the thesis:

Do you agree with this thesis? Why or why not? We’ve covered many ideas in the study guides. Can you find points within the guides that support your agreement or disagreement with the critical writer(s)? Look for new supporting information rather than revisiting the same ones the critics have chosen.

Evaluate the support:

Whether you agree or disagree with the thesis, does the critic provide sufficient research from the text and outside references to make a strong case? What does the article have for support from the text or outside sources? In your opinion, what makes these references valid? Do you feel the author uses this support properly?

Next, locate a second critique about the novel that includes ideas somewhat similar (genre classification, for instance) to any of the discussions you have in your essay. The second critique can either support or refute any of the claims in your paper. The objective of this portion of the essay is to further support your opinion of the primary critic’s thesis or support. Therefore, for example, if you choose a secondary article that refutes any of your claims, you will need to counteract those ideas to bring the focus of your essay back in alignment with your essay’s thesis (your personal opinion of how the primary critic is either correct or incorrect in his or her thesis claim and/or how the first critic is either effective or ineffective in his or her support). Every discussion in this essay should ultimately support the claim you make in your thesis.

For instance, if the first critic argues that Shelley’s writing is juvenile, and if you agree, does the second critic also support this thesis? How so? If the second critic does not support your assessment of the first critic’s thesis, what evidence can you use from the text to argue that the second critic is incorrect? Consider another example: if the first critic believes the novel is autobiographical, and if you disagree, does the second critic help you argue your own view of the first critic’s thesis? If so, how? Perhaps the second critic disagrees with your view and feels the novel is autobiographical– if that’s the case, be prepared to use evidence from the text to refute the second critic’s thesis and support your own argument. Using two critiques in this way will allow you to create a polished, comprehensive Evaluation Essay that allows you to connect your own ideas to those of seasoned critics.

In addition to addressing each of the evaluative components above, develop your essay so it has a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. You must include an evaluative thesis statement in both the introduction and the conclusion. Ensure that each of your claims is supported with valid evidence from the literary criticism you have chosen; the novel, Frankenstein; and/or the study guides.

Using proper MLA style, insert parenthetical citations for all borrowed information in addition to a Works Cited page for Frankenstein and your chosen literary critiques; you are not required to cite the study guides if you use them.

Helpful Hints: For a thesis statement, try answering a question like: How and how well does this piece of criticism state and support its argument regarding Frankenstein?

You might use these as possible guidelines in crafting your thesis statement:
(Critic, aka author of the critique) uses (add critic title) to (add an adjective to describe the effectiveness of the argument such as “adequately” or “inadequately”) argue that (add critic’s thesis) by (explain why and/or include your support).
OR
(Critic)’s (add critique title) (add an adjective to describe the effectiveness of the argument such as “adequately” or “inadequately”) argue that (add critic’s thesis) because (explain why and/or include your support).

More specific thesis examples:

John Smith uses “Frankenstein Critique Essay” to adequately argue that Victor’s mother created the first monster by coddling Victor as a boy.
OR
John Smith’s “Frankenstein Critique Essay” does not effectively argue that Victor’s mother created the first monster because the novel Frankenstein too strongly supports inherent good or bad, which means nurturing roles cannot be held responsible.

The guidelines for this assignment are:

Length: This assignment should be a minimum of 3 typed pages or at least 750 words.

Header: Include a header in the upper left-hand corner of your writing assignment with the following information:

  • Your first and last name
  • Course Title (Composition II)
  • Assignment name (Evaluation Essay, Writing Assignment 4)
  • Current Date

Format:

  • MLA-style source documentation and Works Cited
  • Your last name and page number in the upper-right corner of each page
  • Double-spacing throughout
  • Standard font (TimesNewRoman, Calibri)
  • Title, centered after heading
  • 1” margins on all sides
  • Save the file using one of the following extensions: .docx, .doc, .rtf, or .txt

Underline your thesis statement in the introductory paragraph.

Reminder: You need at least two critiques in addition to the novel in Works Cited in order to receive the highest score. In other words, you need three sources total in cited in the essay and on the Works Cited page in order to earn the maximum points in the corresponding column on the grading rubric. Failure to meet the source minimum will result in a severe decrease in your grade.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

simple personal essay

I just need a 500 word essay that talks about an unforgettable day in your life. For example, it could be the day you first got on an airplane or a special wedding you went to. Anything like that. No outside sources or citations needed.

Title: Unforgettable Da

MLA Format and no plagiarism

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

assignment 1 introduction minerals rocks and running water chapters 1 2 3 and 9

The first homework is going to look at the first four topics of the course, and will be broken into four parts: Introduction to Earth Science, Minerals, Rocks and Running Water. As you complete this assignment, make sure to use your own words and cite information that you get from any source other than the text book, to avoid any form of plagiarism. Assignments must be a .pdf or .doc/docx. Please use a different color text for answers so that I am able to pick out your answers easily. If it is easier, you can also print, write and scan your assignment.


 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

union organizing case study 2

In 500 words,

Use the IRAC method (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) of legal case analysis, analyze the case study by identifying the applicable rule of law(s) relevant to the case.

Resource:

Resource needed has been attached.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

econ 162 macroeconomics

I need this assignment very soon. Thank you!

1.This first question asks you to view Trump’s State of the Union Address on February 4, 2020.You can complete this question once the State of the Union Address has been delivered.

First, go to http://www.whitehouse.gov

and search for “State of the Union Address”.

You can either watch the video or read the transcript.

Second, answer the following questions:

  • How does the president characterize the current state of the US economy?What evidence does he offer to support his arguments?
  • What macroeconomic variables are considered in the speech?
  • What proposals are offered to improve the condition of the American economy?
  • What proposals are offered to improve the U.S. financial system?

e.From the president’s speech in question 1, find a

i.normative, macroeconomic statement.

ii.positive, microeconomic statement.

iii. normative, microeconomic statement.

iv.. positive, macroeconomic statement.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

formal academic essay to apply visual art content to your career field

Essay – ACTS- Stage ‘C”

Write Essay:

Using your academic source/s you will write and submit your essay to the Writing Lab.

Here are the specifics for your essay.

  1. Introduction Paragraph with Thesis Statement as the last sentence in this paragraph
  2. Essay Body: Supporting Arguments to prove your thesis statement
  • 3+ paragraphs with 500-900 word count
  • use at least 2 in-text citations (ideally 3) with supporting evidence from your stage ‘B’ approved academic/scholarly(textbook or library journal article source/s and properly document with any necessary quotation marks (these 2 may not be used for definitions, dates, nor artwork reference only)) Supporting information= some part of your connection and/or contribution (for example evidence supporting why a societal contribution in this area is needed, some visual art which would meet this need in some way, evidence to support the connection itself, etc.
  • include visual artist born after 1900.
  • Add an Artwork Title in correct MLA for extra credit (do not attach or include the actual images of the artwork!)
  1. Conclusion (3+ sentences) Take a summary sentence from each of the body paragraph as it directly relates to your thesis
  2. Works Cited – MLA formatted list of sources used within essay

Essay 2019 – Student .rtf Click for more options

Composition.
a. Grammar and Spelling Count. 1″ Margins, Double Spaced, Times Roman 12pt, correct document type of rtf or doc only

Documentation
MLA Formatting of In-Text Citations –a grade may not be earned without proper in-text citations and documentation
MLA Formatting for all sources used on the Works Cited page -a grade will not be earned without a proper Works Cited page

  • Use MLA 2016 8th edition with both URL and Accessed date for Library database or any instructor approved website. {see example essay}

Note: Complete your assignment using word-processing software such as MS Word 365 (download free software at https://products.office.com/en-us/student?ms.officeurl=getoffice365), LibreOffice (download free software at https://www.libreoffice.org/download), or other per course requirements. Save your file as a .rtf file or .docOnly -to ensure that it can be opened at any computer. Other document types will not be accepted, and could result in earning 0 points.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.